Sign in or 

| Version | User | Scope of changes |
|---|---|---|
| May 20 2009, 5:11 PM EDT (current) | rexkaufman6721 | 4 words added, 2 words deleted |
| Apr 25 2009, 2:10 PM EDT | rexkaufman6721 | 297 words added |
| chapter7bankruptcy72chapter 7 bankruptcy One of the most frequent questions bankruptcy lawyers are asked by potential clients is whether they should file bankruptcy, or employ a debt consolidation company to make payments towards their obligations. But what about those who have the power to make some regular payments to their creditors and don't qualify for chapter 7? Fitted out with this choice, most people decide that debt consolidation, instead of a Chapter thirteen bankruptcy case, is their optimal solution. However, this is kind of never true. In Chapter thirteen, the amount you must repay to repay to your creditors will always be less than (or, at worst, equal ) to what you'll have to repay outside of bankruptcy. Relying on numerous factors--primarily your earnings and expense-- you can get a discharge of your arrears in a Chapter thirteen case paying back anywhere from 0% to one hundred pcpercent of your unsecured loans for 36-60 months. Why is it better to repay 100% in a Chapter 13 rather than doing debt consolidation? Because you don't have to pay for interest accrual on unsecured loans in a Chapter thirteen. Even under the best consolidation deal outside of bankruptcy there's going to be interest paid. This can result in significantly less paid out over time than one would have to pay in a debt consolidation agreement. So if you are in certain eventualities, creditors might have too many assets or revenue to qualify for a Chapter seven case, but are having difficulty handling your monthly payments on your mastercards or other unsecured debts, you need to talk with a bankruptcy solicitor about the chance a Chapter thirteen case. You very well may be in a position to pay off all your unsecured debts with cheap standard payments in less than 5 years! . | |